Unipart Automotive’s study into the comparative performance of its brake pads against five other manufacturers has caused quite a stir.

TMD Friction has issued a rebuttal of the results and instructed lawyers, while others are considering their positions.

We’ll put every development at the top of this timeline so you can see at a glance what the latest twist or turn might be. Things are likely to develop quickly and we will add them as and when they happen.

Unipart-AutomotiveUnipart respond

Unipart Automotive has issued a short response to TMD Friction actions which can be read here. It has also said that it intends to respond to each point outlined in TMD’s report.

tmd_nissh_blackTMD instructs its lawyers

TMD lawyers ask Unipart Automotive to retract its test findings. The full statement can be viewed here.

tmd_nissh_blackTMD Friction’s rebuttal

TMD report says there are flaws with the tests.

Unipart-AutomotiveUnipart brake test

Unipart carries out a comparative study of its braking products and those of five competitors with Quay Brake Testing. It concludes its products are the best overall in the nine tests carried out – read more here.

‘Around a third’ former UKPA branches now have GSF signage

Re-branding exercise continues apace, according to posts from the company

Read More

Nissan to target out of warranty vehicles

New servicing plan aimed at three to ten year-old segment two and three vehicles

Read More

Cazoo to acquire Italian used car group

€80m deal takes online retailer into fifth European country

Read More

IAAF: ‘Unclear’ if UK will extend BER rules

Apparent ‘lack of desire’ from UK government to extend rules in line with EU states

Read More

ECP extends Kawasaki British superbike sponsorship

Factor chain to renew deal with youngest rider in the Championship

Read More

Join the debate

1 Comment

Leave a Reply to phil Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. you can argue all you like TMD but at the end of the day every manufacturer was subject to the same indep. test….your product failed to match up….end of story