MOT Frequency comes up for debate… Again

The MOT frequency debate is likely to restart following comments from the Transport Minister.

Frequency change mooted… again.

Grant Shapps, Secretary of State for Transport, made the suggestion to relax the frequency after being asked by the Prime Minister to come up with ideas to tackle the cost of living crisis, according to a BBC report.

If confirmed, this will be the fourth time in a decade that lengthening the time between inspections has been mooted. Previously, the idea has been shouted down by aftermarket associations and road safety bodies.

In Northern Ireland, reducing test frequency was the subject of a ‘call for evidence’ in 2021, although no decision has been announced since the consultation closed last October.

Despite a government perception that the test is a financial burden for motorists, the maximum test fee of £54.85 has not increased since 2010.

 

 

Published by Greg Whitaker

Editor of CAT Magazine and an experienced motoring journalist @GregWhitaker5

Delphi product blitz to bring 1000 new parts per year

New suspension and steering components will mean firm covers some 180 million cars across EMEA region

Read More

GSF Car Parts opens two new branches in Southern England

New locations aim to improve the firm’s delivery times in West Sussex and North London

Read More

WAI signs agreement with Motus to expand into South African market

The move will “further expand the number of solutions we bring to the global aftermarket”

Read More

Hand car washes to be targeted in new government immigration probe

Around 1,000 staff, previously assigned to the now-abandoned Rwanda deportation scheme, will lead the effort

Read More

“Import more mechanics” or aftermarket garages will grind to a halt, government told

The sector is in an employment pit with vacancy rates at 5.1 per 100 employees, its highest point in 21 years

Read More

Join the debate

4 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Not sure it makes sense. The logic behind going to two years is to save a motorist 55 quid. In the grand scheme of motoring costs, not sure that even registers. When you factor in what the MOT gives you in terms of safety and piece of mind, the logic for the change seems ridiculous.

    Knocking 5% of fuel duty would seem a much better idea. Save the motorist money with no downside.

  2. We have been here before as a tester for over 25 years evidence show’s what can happen to vehicles not maintained and some of the defects found on car’s at their first test at 3 years

  3. Here we go again, money before safety. As an experienced MOT tester I have seen so many cars that have been
    scrapped a year after their last MOT due to not being viable to repair. How many deaths before the half wits
    realise they are gambling with peoples lives.

    1. i agree with you entirely, after the lockdown extension on mots some of the cars being presented were terrible, and customers suprised when you issue a fail certificate. some customers kept driving their cars until they got the full extension knowing their cars had issues. for me its a NO.